Three improvements I hope to see for the CPF system

 

Now that the chatter about the CPF changes has died down, it's time for me to develop a wish list for the CPF Board. I have tried to make it as reasonable for the CPF Board to do this, given that the disappearance of the CPF-SA after age 55 would free up some fiscal room to give more for CPF members.

Here's my wish list :

a) Make CPF-Life scale linearly with premiums.

There is a progressive element to CPF-Life payouts that discourages folks from putting more money into the CPF-RA. The CPF-Life payouts per unit premium paid are higher for lower sums committed to the program. This is to provide more retirement assistance to those with less savings.

This policy will no longer be necessary if we provide more top-ups to lower-income groups. ITE graduates who enter Poly already get increased amounts in their accounts. 

The middle-income groups need to feel they are getting a fair amount from participating in CPF Life; otherwise, they will think they are subsidising other citizens when they engage in risk-pooling.

b) End the hypocrisy around the Retirement Sum Top-Up Scheme. Give us something we can use.

The RSTU is a powerful avenue to reduce personal income taxes for high-earning professionals. However, the government will disable RSTU once the member accumulates the FRS to curb too many advantages to the wealthy. But that's not the end of the story; at age 55, RSTU makes a comeback, and you can do it until your CPF-RA reaches the ERS. 

This whole system is dumb because the significant earning years do not entitle most professionals to benefit from RSTU. Thanks to completing CPF-OA transfers every year, I personally reached FRS in my CPF-SA in my early 30s. For the folks who can use RSTU again at age 55, they may no longer have a career that can benefit from tax benefits anymore. CPFB folks seem real niggardly to enact a policy like this. 

With such a high bar to reach 4xBRS, the CPFB may throw a dog a bone and allow RSTU to keep accumulating until ERS. A maximum contribution of $8,000 is a little every year, and CPFB should also have a policy that benefits PMETs, given that we're throwing money at ITE grads to enter Polytechnics. 

c) Have a CPF-Life scheme that pays married couples until both pass away.

 

With so much emphasis on marriage, starting families and having children, it's ludicrous that the CPF-Life scheme does not have an annuity program that continues paying to support the other spouse after the member spouse passes away. 

Of course, if an annuity is designed to pay until both spouses die, the monthly payouts can be calculated to be much smaller by design. Still, I would undoubtedly prefer a fixed payout, at least for my wife, after I pass away. 

Do note that folks with young spouses will get tiny payouts in such a case. This is all set by actuarial tables anyway. 

I want this so much that I'd happily sacrifice that stupid political compromise, the Basic Plan, to make it happen. An alternative would be to allow CPF-RA transfers between spouses. 

Anyway, these are my suggestions to the policymakers. 

Feel free to discuss how feasible they are.